Pagini recente » Diferente pentru blog/your-bisection-search-is-wrong intre reviziile 25 si 20 | Diferente pentru blog/your-bisection-search-is-wrong intre reviziile 25 si 15 | Diferente pentru blog/your-bisection-search-is-wrong intre reviziile 25 si 24 | Diferente pentru blog/your-bisection-search-is-wrong intre reviziile 25 si 22 | Diferente pentru blog/your-bisection-search-is-wrong intre reviziile 9 si 10
Nu exista diferente intre titluri.
Diferente intre continut:
Done! No more epsilon! The result is as accurate as possible given a double representation.
*BTW Tomek Czajka pointed out that my final version is buggy as well. It doesn't work for c = 1e60. The problem is the number of iterations is too small.*
*BTW Tomek Czajka pointed out that my final version is buggy as well. It doesn't work for c = 1e60. The problem is the number of iterations is too small, and for it to work correctly it needs about 1100 steps.*
We’ve addressed negative numbers, numbers in (0, 1), overflow problems, absolute and relative error problems.
Nu exista diferente intre securitate.
Topicul de forum nu a fost schimbat.
