Pagini recente » Diferente pentru blog/your-bisection-search-is-wrong intre reviziile 12 si 11 | Diferente pentru blog/your-bisection-search-is-wrong intre reviziile 15 si 14 | Diferente pentru blog/your-bisection-search-is-wrong intre reviziile 11 si 10 | Diferente pentru blog/your-bisection-search-is-wrong intre reviziile 6 si 5 | Diferente pentru blog/your-bisection-search-is-wrong intre reviziile 10 si 9
Nu exista diferente intre titluri.
Diferente intre continut:
Done! No more epsilon! The result is as accurate as possible given a double representation.
*BTW Tomek Czajka pointed out that my final version is buggy as well. It doesn't work for c = 1e60. The problem is the number of iterations is too small, and for it to work correctly it needs about 1100 steps.*
*BTW Tomek Czajka pointed out that my final version is buggy as well. It doesn't work for c = 1e60. The problem is the number of iterations is too small.*
We’ve addressed negative numbers, numbers in (0, 1), overflow problems, absolute and relative error problems.
Nu exista diferente intre securitate.
Topicul de forum nu a fost schimbat.
