Pagini recente » Profil SnakeBit | Diferente pentru blog/meet-in-the-middle intre reviziile 48 si 49 | Diferente pentru blog/meet-in-the-middle intre reviziile 123 si 51 | Diferente pentru blog/meet-in-the-middle intre reviziile 99 si 98 | Diferente pentru blog/meet-in-the-middle intre reviziile 98 si 97
Nu exista diferente intre titluri.
Diferente intre continut:
!<blog/meet-in-the-middle?2des.png 70%!
DES is an encryption standard which uses 56 bit keys. Today computers can use a brute force approach to break the encryption. One simple approach to make the encryption more secure is to apply it twice, using two different keys. This approach is susceptible to the meet in the middle attack developed by Diffie Hellman. 3DES is less susceptible as it encrypts the message three times using 3 keys.
Let’s see why 2DES is vulnerable. Let $Ek$ be the encryption function using the secret key $k$ and $Dk$ the decryption function using the secret key $k$. 2DES uses two keys, k,K and Ek(EK(p)) = s to encrypt and DK(Dk(s)) = p to decrypt.
Let’s see why 2DES is vulnerable. Let $Ek$ be the encryption function using the secret key $k$ and $Dk$ the decryption function using the secret key $k$. 2DES uses Ek1(Ek2(p)) = s to encrypt and Dk2(Dk1(s)) = p to decrypt.
Diffie Hellman’s meet in the middle attack trades off space for time to find out the two secret keys.
For the pattern p it tries all the possible keys to obtain a set of numbers corresponding Ek(p). Also for the pattern s it uses all the possible keys to decrypt s, Dk(s).
Nu exista diferente intre securitate.
Topicul de forum nu a fost schimbat.